![]() |
Infallible Roulette Systems
Some of these systems have been endorsed by notable professionals. Others have been hawked like some product from the back of a wagon. At any case, one thing is clear. There is yet to be system that clearly and consistently beats roulette on a regular basis. And why? Why can’t someone invent an infallible roulette system that can accurately predict the outcome of a spin of the wheel? Can’t a computer do it? Can’t someone figure out percentages of the most common numbers? The answer is no and here is why. It’s All About ChanceA computer cannot consistently and accurately predict the outcome of a roulette spin because roulette is not a game with a reoccurring pattern. It is a random game of chance. Unless the wheel has been fixed in some way (do I even need to mention how illegal that is?) the roulette ball is not going to fall into any particular slot more often than another. There may be times when a streak may come along for three or four spins but that is more likely to happen on even-odd bets. Some people will tell you that there are numbers that do hit more often than others. If this were a hundred percent true, then there would be far more wealthy roulette players today. And if it were a hundred percent true then no casino would carry the game because they would be losing money. The simple truth is that a previous spin of the roulette wheel has absolutely no effect on the next spin. It is all random. Are All Roulette Systems Scams?Yes. The Internet is full of salesmen pushing the latest roulette system with get-rich-quick claims. It may be a roulette computer or some method using math and percentages to figure out the outcome of the next spin. Don’t waste your time on them. There are even those who, with the blindness of religious fervor, swear that one particular roulette system is the genuine article. Whether they are the actual salesperson or someone who is paid to endorse their product, they will claim beyond all reasonable doubt that a system will work consistently every single time. Try not to be fooled by statements from “John H. from Minnesota” or Kevin C. from Nevada”. These are tools used to try to persuade you into buying the system by thinking that there are customers out there who have successfully tried it. Many roulette systems have been put through computer simulations. And you know what the results were? After simulation, the computer found that these systems did no better than if a person was playing and betting without the aid of any system. The win-loss ratio averaged the same. Many salesmen will tell you that testing on a computer is not real life and a computer cannot possibly take into account real life factors. This argument can quickly be debunked because all new casino games are computer tested before they are put into play at a casino. A computer will run millions of simulation tests to cover all possibilities that could happen in real life. If it doesn’t work on the computer, it doesn’t work in real life. My advice would be not to waste your time and money on these self-acclaimed “infallible” roulette systems. Roulette Systems Over the YearsAs long as there has been gambling, there have been systems to beat the house. By using these systems for short runs, some players have been lucky enough to win big by betting big. However, these systems don’t hold up on long runs because the longer you play, the more the odds fall in favor of the house. Here is a run-down of some of the popular roulette systems over the years. The Martingle System - The Martingale is the oldest roulette system which was devised by Henry Martingale, a gambling house operator during the 18th century. Casanova played using that system in the casinos of Venice. By using the Martingale, the bets made are on even money bets and a player will double their bet after each loss. The purpose of the Martingale system is to get back all of a player’s previous losses in one spin plus make a profit on top of that. The weakness of this system is sooner or later the player will hit a bad run, which will result in him reaching the table’s maximum bet. The result will be that the player won’t be able to double up further to win their money back. This system runs a high risk of wiping out a player’s bankroll in just a few spins. The Philiberte System – In this system, a player hopes that the bank will not be able to win 3 bets in a row. The player will play progressions consisting of three increasing bets. If the player loses three times, then they will start a new progression using bigger bets. As an example, let’s say that the bets are even money bets. The first progression employed is 1, 2, and 4. If the first one unit bet is lost and a second bet of 2 units wins, the net profit is one unit. If 2 bets are lost and the 3rd one of 4 units won, the outcome is a positive return of 4-2-1= +1 unit. If all 3 bets for the amount of 7 units are lost in succession, a player starts a new 3 bets progression: 1, 3 and 7. He plays that progression until he gets back first 7 lost units and so on. The system can work sporadically for longer periods of time ONLY if you have a huge bankroll to play with. The Labouchere System - This roulette system is named after Henry Dupre Labouchere, a 19th century Victorian journalist and politician. He often vacationed in Monte Carlo where he played roulette every day. According to Labouchere, his system helped him to win enough money to pay for his vacations. When a player uses this system, they divide their bankroll in three unequal parts which are written down on a score sheet. For ex, he writes down the sequence 1, 2 and 3. The numbers are in betting units and are made on even number bets. The player’s goal is to win 1 + 2 + 3 = +6 units. This roulette system is more reliable than the Martingale system because it will enable a player to stay in the game longer. The system may look good on paper but if the player hits on a prolonged losing streak will force bigger bets which may lead to bigger losses. |
Online Roulette Daddy Home How To Calculate Roulette Betting Odds |
Relocated pages: 1